« June 2008 | Main | August 2008 »

July 2008

July 26, 2008

BAHÁ'U'LLÁH PROMISES LIVING INTERPRETER

POSTED ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN OF THE BAHÁ'Í FAITH (Orthodox)

BAHÁ'U'LLÁH PROMISES IMPERISHABLE ACCESS TO A LIVING INTERPRETER THROUGHOUT HIS DISPENSATION

"Those words uttered by the luminaries of truth must needs be pondered, and should their significance be not grasped, enlightenment should be sought from the trustees of the depositories of knowledge, that these may expound their meaning, and unravel their mystery. for it behooveth no man to interpret the holy words according to his own imperfect understanding, nor having found them to be contrary to his inclination and desires to reject and repudiate their truth. for such, today, is the manner of the divines and doctors of the age, who occupy the seats of knowledge and learning, and who have named ignorance knowledge, and called oppression justice."

Kitab-i-Iqan (p.182)

Similarly to Muhammad Who, in referring to the Imams who were destined to succeed Him and be the sole interpreters of His word, stated in the Qu'ran:

"ASK YE THEREFORE, OF THEM THAT HAVE THE CUSTODY OF THE SCRIPTURES, IF YE KNOW IT NOT." Bahá'u'lláh has likewise cautioned "NO MAN TO INTERPRET THE HOLY WORDS ACCORDING TO HIS OWN IMPERFECT UNDERSTANDING..." or "CONTRARY TO HIS INCLINATION AND DESIRES..." and has enjoined those who do not grasp the significance of the revealed Word to seek enlightenment from the "TRUSTEES OF THE DEPOSITORIES OF KNOWLEDGE" (the depositories of Knowledge being their revealed Writings).

It is obvious that these Trustees (note the plurality) must be living to provide this sole source of interpretation as long as the Dispensation of Bahá'u'lláh endures. Is it not clear, therefore, that Bahá'u'lláh promised that there would be this continued source of interpretation following the Ascension of `Abdu'l-Bahá? And, therefore, `Abdu'l-Bahá provided for this continuing source of interpretation in the Institution of the Guardianship in His Will and Testament, a sacred Document that should actually be considered a part of the immutable explicit holy Text and nothing less than "THEIR WILL" for, as Shoghi Effendi has explained in his work God Passes By: 

"THIS INSTRUMENT CAN, IF WE WOULD CORRECTLY APPRAISE IT, NO MORE BE DIVORCED FROM THE ONE WHO PROVIDED THE MOTIVATING IMPULSE FOR ITS CREATION THAN FROM HIM WHO DIRECTLY CONCEIVED IT."

Yet, in complete disregard of the foregoing, this divinely-conceived, co-authored, immutable and sacred Document has been shamefully and inexplicably repudiated by those who contend that the Guardianship of the Cause of God has come to and end only thirty-six years after the inception of the Administrative Order, "FASHIONED BY THE HAND OF ITS PERFECT ARCHITECT" in which the Guardian has been designated both the Head of the Faith and the "SACRED HEAD FOR LIFE" of its supreme legislative Organ.

(Emphasis added)

Joel Bray Marangella

Guardian of the Baha'i Faith

July, 2008

Web:  http://www.Bahai-Guardian.com

July 18, 2008

There is no such thing as an "Orthodox Baha'i"

"There is no such thing as an 'Orthodox Baha'i'" wrote one confused Bahá'í to one of my fellow believers.  That comment really amused me since it speaks so clearly about the mind-set of the sans-Guardian Bahá'ís who are in denial about the truth. No longer believing their own teachings, the sans-Guardian Bahá'ís actually believe that unity comes by the subservience of all individuals to the beliefs, false or not, of the majority. If someone dares to question the majority view, they are cast out from the Faith and their very existence is denied. This view is ridiculous but widely held.

We are "Orthodox" because we hold to the original teachings of our Faith. That is, that unity is achieved in obedience to the Guardian, and not to the views of the majority vote. Yes, there is such a thing as an Orthodox Bahá'í, and there is no manner of shunning, coercion, denial or court proceeding that will change that fact.

Jeffrey

July 11, 2008

For unity's sake: abandon counterfeit doctrines and imitations

When `Abdu'l-Bahá traveled through the United States, on 16 June 1912, He spoke before the Central Congregational Church in Brooklyn, New York on the subject of religious unity.  It would behove Bahá'ís everywhere today to carefully consider His comments and to act accordingly.

`Abdu'l-Bahá (as set forth in The Promulgation of Universal Peace):

"Just as in the world of politics there is need for free thought, likewise in the world of religion there should be the right of unrestricted individual belief. Consider what a vast difference exists between modern democracy and the old forms of despotism. Under an autocratic government the opinions of men are not free, and development is stifled, whereas in democracy, because thought and speech are not restricted, the greatest progress is witnessed. It is likewise true in the world of religion. When freedom of conscience, liberty of thought and right of speech prevail -- that is to say, when every man according to his own idealization may give expression to his beliefs -- development and growth are inevitable...."  [Emphasis added]

In considering this comment, it seems to me that `Abdu'l-Bahá is championing the right of this web site (http://www.truebahai.com) to exist. This is my personal web site and in it I publish my religious views.  That is, I give expression to my beliefs according to my own idealization.  Yet the National Spiritual Assembly of the Bahá'ís of the United States took legal action against the Orthodox Bahá'í Faith to try (among other things) to have my web site shut down. Doesn't it seem strange to you that the leaders of an organization that purports to revere and follow `Abdu'l-Bahá would take this kind of action against me in light of the Master's clear views on religious liberty and the freedom to express one's beliefs?  The NSA would probably respond as they did in the court papers, to allege that this site causes confusion in the minds of the public as to its source.  Really?  Is there anybody out there who visits my site really confused about whether I am a supporter or not of the NSA?  Come on.  There is not a single article on this web site that I don't make abundantly clear my contempt for and opposition to the NSA. If anybody is confused, they are simply not reading the site.

"The divine religion is reality, and reality is not multiple; it is one. Therefore, the foundations of the religious systems are one because all proceed from the indivisible reality; but the followers of these systems have disagreed; discord, strife and warfare have arisen among them, for they have forsaken the foundation and held to that which is but imitation and semblance. Inasmuch as imitations differ, enmity and dissension have resulted...."

In this part of His speech,`Abdu'l-Bahá opines about the reason for disunity in religion.  He says that discord and strife among religions is because the followers of the religions have abandoned the foundation of their faith and have followed imitation.  In other words, it is the failure of religious persons to independently investigate the truth of the matter that is the cause of disunity. Instead of investigating for themselves, they follow the opinions of others including their leadership.  But is that not what is happening today with the NSA and its minions?  Are they not blindly following imitation, obeying the dictates of their leaders without making any serious investigation of the arguments and ideas presented by the Orthodox Bahá'ís?  Instead of investigating reality, they attempt to silence me and my fellow Orthodox Bahá'ís through the secular court system. This is not at all consistent with the Master's teachings.
 
"If Christians of all denominations and divisions should investigate reality, the foundations of Christ will unite them. No enmity or hatred will remain, for they will all be under the one guidance of reality itself. Likewise, in the wider field if all the existing religious systems will turn away from ancestral imitations and investigate reality, seeking the real meanings of the Holy Books, they will unite and agree upon the same foundation, reality itself. As long as they follow counterfeit doctrines or imitations instead of reality, animosity and discord will exist and increase."
 
Almost 100 years ago, the Master here sets forth the prescription for overcoming religious animosity and discord: not to follow counterfeit docrines or imitations instead of reality. All I can say to the Bahá'ís who follow the NSA, has it ever occurred to you that the abandonment of the Guardianship and with it many of the verities of the Faith, and the embrace of a headless so-called Universal House of Justice in place of the one described in the Will and Testament of `Abdu'l-Bahá is precisely to follow COUNTERFEIT DOCTRINES AND IMITATIONS.  This is common sense my friends. Attempting to silence us in the courts is not the method of attaining unity prescribed by the Master. How far will you allow your leadership to stray from the clear teachings of the Faith before you abandon its COUNTERFEIT DOCTRINES AND IMITATIONS

The third Guardian's web site can found at http://www.bahai-guardian.com/

Jeffrey

July 03, 2008

Deep discussions at OBF conferences!

Chad, an Orthodox Bahá'í in another deep discussion had at last June's Orthodox Bahá'í conference.


Notice:

  • The Orthodox Bahá'í Faith has no affiliation with the Bahá'í Faith presently headquartered in Wilmette, Illinois or Haifa, Israel. Opinions expressed are those of the blog author only who is solely responsible for its content, and are not necessarily the opinion of the Orthodox Bahá'í Faith or its members.

June 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Advertisement

*****